HomeCompare → Corona vs Sugar Land

Corona, CA vs Sugar Land, TX

Corona, CA

71
Grade: B
Violent Rate249.4/100k
Property Rate1723.6/100k
Population161,174
View Details →

Sugar Land, TX

83
Grade: A
Violent Rate78.0/100k
Property Rate1383.7/100k
Population107,757
View Details →

🏆 Sugar Land is Safer

by 12 points

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Corona, CA or Sugar Land, TX safer?

Sugar Land is safer with a higher safety score by 12 points. Corona, CA has a safety score of 71/100 while Sugar Land, TX has 83/100, based on FBI Uniform Crime Report data.

What is the violent crime rate in Corona, CA vs Sugar Land, TX?

Corona, CA has a violent crime rate of 249.4 per 100,000 residents, while Sugar Land, TX has 78.0 per 100,000. Lower rates indicate safer communities. The national average is approximately 380 per 100,000.

What is the property crime rate in Corona, CA vs Sugar Land, TX?

Corona, CA has a property crime rate of 1723.6 per 100,000, compared to 1383.7 per 100,000 in Sugar Land, TX. Property crimes include burglary, theft, and motor vehicle theft.

How are CrimeSafe safety scores calculated?

Safety scores range from 0-100, combining violent crime rates, property crime rates, and population data from the FBI UCR. Higher scores mean safer cities. Grades: A (80+), B (65-79), C (50-64), D (40-49), F (below 40).

Should I move to Corona, CA or Sugar Land, TX?

Based on crime data alone, Sugar Land is safer. However, safety is just one factor — also consider cost of living, job market, schools, and quality of life. Visit our city pages for more details on each.