Lancaster, CA vs Missoula, MT
Lancaster, CA
Missoula, MT
🤝 It's a Tie!
Same safety score
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lancaster, CA or Missoula, MT safer?
Lancaster, CA is safer with a higher safety score by several points. Lancaster, CA has a safety score of 59/100 while Missoula, MT has 59/100, based on FBI Uniform Crime Report data.
What is the violent crime rate in Lancaster, CA vs Missoula, MT?
Lancaster, CA has a violent crime rate of 834.7 per 100,000 residents, while Missoula, MT has 596.9 per 100,000. Lower rates indicate safer communities. The national average is approximately 380 per 100,000.
What is the property crime rate in Lancaster, CA vs Missoula, MT?
Lancaster, CA has a property crime rate of 1920.6 per 100,000, compared to 3629.4 per 100,000 in Missoula, MT. Property crimes include burglary, theft, and motor vehicle theft.
How are CrimeSafe safety scores calculated?
Safety scores range from 0-100, combining violent crime rates, property crime rates, and population data from the FBI UCR. Higher scores mean safer cities. Grades: A (80+), B (65-79), C (50-64), D (40-49), F (below 40).
Should I move to Lancaster, CA or Missoula, MT?
Based on crime data alone, Lancaster, CA is safer. However, safety is just one factor — also consider cost of living, job market, schools, and quality of life. Visit our city pages for more details on each.