HomeCompare → Lancaster vs Sugar Land

Lancaster, CA vs Sugar Land, TX

Lancaster, CA

59
Grade: D
Violent Rate834.7/100k
Property Rate1920.6/100k
Population164,012
View Details →

Sugar Land, TX

83
Grade: A
Violent Rate78.0/100k
Property Rate1383.7/100k
Population107,757
View Details →

🏆 Sugar Land is Safer

by 24 points

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lancaster, CA or Sugar Land, TX safer?

Sugar Land is safer with a higher safety score by 24 points. Lancaster, CA has a safety score of 59/100 while Sugar Land, TX has 83/100, based on FBI Uniform Crime Report data.

What is the violent crime rate in Lancaster, CA vs Sugar Land, TX?

Lancaster, CA has a violent crime rate of 834.7 per 100,000 residents, while Sugar Land, TX has 78.0 per 100,000. Lower rates indicate safer communities. The national average is approximately 380 per 100,000.

What is the property crime rate in Lancaster, CA vs Sugar Land, TX?

Lancaster, CA has a property crime rate of 1920.6 per 100,000, compared to 1383.7 per 100,000 in Sugar Land, TX. Property crimes include burglary, theft, and motor vehicle theft.

How are CrimeSafe safety scores calculated?

Safety scores range from 0-100, combining violent crime rates, property crime rates, and population data from the FBI UCR. Higher scores mean safer cities. Grades: A (80+), B (65-79), C (50-64), D (40-49), F (below 40).

Should I move to Lancaster, CA or Sugar Land, TX?

Based on crime data alone, Sugar Land is safer. However, safety is just one factor — also consider cost of living, job market, schools, and quality of life. Visit our city pages for more details on each.