Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Rochester Hills, MI
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Rochester Hills, MI
🏆 Rochester Hills is Safer
by 18 points
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Rancho Cucamonga, CA or Rochester Hills, MI safer?
Rochester Hills is safer with a higher safety score by 18 points. Rancho Cucamonga, CA has a safety score of 69/100 while Rochester Hills, MI has 87/100, based on FBI Uniform Crime Report data.
What is the violent crime rate in Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Rochester Hills, MI?
Rancho Cucamonga, CA has a violent crime rate of 293.7 per 100,000 residents, while Rochester Hills, MI has 92.2 per 100,000. Lower rates indicate safer communities. The national average is approximately 380 per 100,000.
What is the property crime rate in Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Rochester Hills, MI?
Rancho Cucamonga, CA has a property crime rate of 1811.1 per 100,000, compared to 531.9 per 100,000 in Rochester Hills, MI. Property crimes include burglary, theft, and motor vehicle theft.
How are CrimeSafe safety scores calculated?
Safety scores range from 0-100, combining violent crime rates, property crime rates, and population data from the FBI UCR. Higher scores mean safer cities. Grades: A (80+), B (65-79), C (50-64), D (40-49), F (below 40).
Should I move to Rancho Cucamonga, CA or Rochester Hills, MI?
Based on crime data alone, Rochester Hills is safer. However, safety is just one factor — also consider cost of living, job market, schools, and quality of life. Visit our city pages for more details on each.