Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Springfield, MA

Rancho Cucamonga is safer with a higher safety score by 13 points. Rancho Cucamonga, CA has a safety score of 69/100 while Springfield, MA has 56/100, based on FBI Uniform Crime Report data.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA has a violent crime rate of 293.7 per 100,000 residents, while Springfield, MA has 891.4 per 100,000. Lower rates indicate safer communities. The national average is approximately 380 per 100,000.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA has a property crime rate of 1811.1 per 100,000, compared to 2835.5 per 100,000 in Springfield, MA. Property crimes include burglary, theft, and motor vehicle theft.

Safety scores range from 0-100, combining violent crime rates, property crime rates, and population data from the FBI UCR. Higher scores mean safer cities. Grades: A (80+), B (65-79), C (50-64), D (40-49), F (below 40).

Based on crime data alone, Rancho Cucamonga is safer. However, safety is just one factor — also consider cost of living, job market, schools, and quality of life. Visit our city pages for more details on each.