HomeCompare → Rancho Cucamonga vs Sugar Land

Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Sugar Land, TX

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

69
Grade: C
Violent Rate293.7/100k
Property Rate1811.1/100k
Population174,313
View Details →

Sugar Land, TX

83
Grade: A
Violent Rate78.0/100k
Property Rate1383.7/100k
Population107,757
View Details →

🏆 Sugar Land is Safer

by 14 points

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Rancho Cucamonga, CA or Sugar Land, TX safer?

Sugar Land is safer with a higher safety score by 14 points. Rancho Cucamonga, CA has a safety score of 69/100 while Sugar Land, TX has 83/100, based on FBI Uniform Crime Report data.

What is the violent crime rate in Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Sugar Land, TX?

Rancho Cucamonga, CA has a violent crime rate of 293.7 per 100,000 residents, while Sugar Land, TX has 78.0 per 100,000. Lower rates indicate safer communities. The national average is approximately 380 per 100,000.

What is the property crime rate in Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Sugar Land, TX?

Rancho Cucamonga, CA has a property crime rate of 1811.1 per 100,000, compared to 1383.7 per 100,000 in Sugar Land, TX. Property crimes include burglary, theft, and motor vehicle theft.

How are CrimeSafe safety scores calculated?

Safety scores range from 0-100, combining violent crime rates, property crime rates, and population data from the FBI UCR. Higher scores mean safer cities. Grades: A (80+), B (65-79), C (50-64), D (40-49), F (below 40).

Should I move to Rancho Cucamonga, CA or Sugar Land, TX?

Based on crime data alone, Sugar Land is safer. However, safety is just one factor — also consider cost of living, job market, schools, and quality of life. Visit our city pages for more details on each.